<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sunshocked &#187; greenwashing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sunshocked.com/stanifesto/tag/greenwashing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sunshocked.com</link>
	<description>est. 2000</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 23:38:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Green Issue Showdown: Creative Review vs. Common Ground</title>
		<link>http://sunshocked.com/stanifesto/archives/green-issue-showdown-creative-review-vs-common-ground</link>
		<comments>http://sunshocked.com/stanifesto/archives/green-issue-showdown-creative-review-vs-common-ground#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 16:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenwashing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sunshocked.com/stanifesto/archives/green-issue-showdown-creative-review-vs-common-ground/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earth Day was last month and magazines made the most of it by making April their &#8220;Green Issue&#8221;. Here&#8217;s my favorite, and least favorite, of the bunch. In my days before being the web designer for RAN, I did a fair bit of print work and developed an interest in ways to minimize the ecological [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earth Day was last month and magazines made the most of it by making April their &#8220;Green Issue&#8221;. Here&#8217;s my favorite, and least favorite, of the bunch.<span id="more-232"></span></p>
<p>In my days before being the web designer for <a href="http://ran.org/" title="RAN.org">RAN</a>, I did a fair bit of print work and developed an interest in ways to minimize the ecological impact of what&mdash;at the end of the day&mdash;is still turning trees into disposable content. It&#8217;s when I first learned of the <a href="http://credibleforestcertification.org/" title="CredibleForestCertification.org">FSC</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenaf" title="Kenaf on Wikipedia">kenaf</a>. I truly believe that we need a take-your-values-to-work day as our 9-to-5 efforts often have just as big an impact on our environment as the lightbulbs we use or car we drive. I&#8217;ve been <a href="http://www.sunshocked.com/stanifesto/archives/design-and-social-change/" title="'Design and social change' on Stanifesto">paying attention recently</a> to the role designers play in creating both desire (and thus consumption!) and <a href="http://www.worldchanging.com/" title="Worldchanging.com">solutions</a>.</p>
<p>For this reason, I was delighted to pick up the &#8220;Green Issue&#8221; of <a href="http://www.creativereview.co.uk/" title="CreativeReview.co.uk">Creative Review</a> magazine. According to the cover, it&#8217;s technically called the &#8220;It&#8217;s About Time We Did Something About Sustainability and the Environment&#8221; issue. That same cover also has the table of contents, just to save some pages. Getting magazine designers to think about sustainability leads to some very interesting innovations. A special section breaks down how much ink, paper, metal plates, and chemicals went into the issue&#8217;s making and how they&#8217;ve sized the magazine to waste less paper (it&#8217;s square), are switching to a new paper, recycle their plates and unsold copies, and are examining their entire supply chain for ways to improve.</p>
<p>Other articles include: Creative Activism, talking to your clients about sustainability, how to design for low impact, <a href="http://www.apple.com/hotnews/agreenerapple/" title="A Greener Apple">the greening of Apple</a>, inside the greenwashing industry, and taking your studio carbon-neutral. All the bases are covered. Finally, they fully acknowledge the &#8220;Green Issue&#8221; trend and the dangers of mere lip service instead pledging that the changes they made for this issue will be permanent from now on and advertising their downloadable version <a href="http://www.creativereview.co.uk/e-cr/" title="E-CR">E-CR</a> which, obviously, saves a lot of ink and paper.</p>
<p>In stark contrast, I picked up the latest copy of <a href="http://commongroundmag.com/" title="CommonGround Magazine">Common Ground</a> at my local coffee shop, taking note of interviews with both <a href="http://www.billmckibben.com/" title="BillMcKibben.com">Bill McKibben</a> and <a href="http://grist.org/news/maindish/2007/03/20/vanjones/index.html" title="Van's interview on Grist">Van Jones</a> (who makes me proud to be a Jones). The articles were great as expected but I was horrified to find three more copies sitting on my front steps when I got back to my apartment. One for me, one for my roommate, one for my upstairs neighbors. I looked around and noted that yes, everyone on my block had received a free copy of the &#8220;Earth Day&#8221; issue. I&#8217;m already a member of <a href="http://www.greendimes.com/" title="GreenDimes.com">GreenDimes</a> to avoid just this situation and the added preposterousness of it being the &#8220;Green Issue&#8221; was honestly insulting.</p>
<p>I tried to find an explanation inside of how Common Ground, with a print run of 50,000, was monitoring and improving its practices. All I could find was a recycled logo, with no indication of the degree (100% post-consumer, I&#8217;m hoping). For a San Francisco magazine full of ads for organic milk and yoga retreats, it gets its ass handed to it by a bunch of UK designers in terms of walking the walk. Here&#8217;s hoping they step it up and outdo them next round, as I do genuinely appreciate the content.</p>
<p>Okay, I admit that I haven&#8217;t read every single Green Issue that&#8217;s out there, but these are my picks. Feel free to nominate your own best and worst Green Issues in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sunshocked.com/stanifesto/archives/green-issue-showdown-creative-review-vs-common-ground/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
